Arguably

To those who have already – or always – had the insight which I am about to describe, this post might seem so obvious as to be silly. Nevertheless it is worth describing, because some others may have shared my hitherto incomplete understanding of the word ‘arguably’.You often hear the expression ‘arguably the world’s greatest writer’ or something of the sort. While it is instinctively clear that the speaker is saying that the person in question is the world’s greatest writer, you might understand the ‘arguably’ as denoting the feeling that this claim might be questioned by some others.

When reading an article in The Independent of May 4, 2007 (here: http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article2510870.ece), however, the following line jumped out at me:

‘It is at least arguable that Ségolène Royal…has been the saviour of the Socialist Party in France.’

That construction makes it clear what ‘arguably’ means: it means that it is possible to argue the case for the speaker’s claim. That is, the speaker is saying, ‘it is possible to argue that so-and-so is the world’s greatest writer.’

Sydney dims its lights

There is much talk nowadays about global warming and energy saving, but little conscious action to reduce unnecessary consumption. Sydney’s one-hour blackout (see this article) this weekend in what was dubbed “Earth Hour” is a commendable, if only symbolic, gesture.

Awakening

Waking up early in the morning can be quite an effort for most of us, but the rewards are considerable. Sitting up and allowing the mists of the mind to clear away as the sky turns imperceptibly from dark to light, soaking in the absolute quiet, and feeling (if only from behind a glass window) a part of nature: the stuff of poetry.

At the Ground

An article I have posted on http://pavilionseat.wordpress.com

Reading about cricket always puts me in a good mood. Especially when the writing is top-notch, combining the evergreen qualities of literature with the warm glow of the sporting activity it describes.

Such are the entries in The Picador Book of Cricket, a book that I had heard much about but never read until recently, when I have been able to read some of the pieces in it.

Some of the writing about the pleasures of watching a cricket match led me to think about my own experiences of watching cricket live, in Chennai and in Pune.

The first first-class match I can remember watching was a Duleep Trophy match in Chennai (then Madras), at the MA Chidambaram Stadium at Chepauk, a ground which has been synonymous with high quality cricket for my generation (earlier generations saw some Test matches at the Corporation Stadium). I must have been younger than ten, but I remember clearly the experience of sitting in the Madras Cricket Club members’ pavilion, courtesy of a relative who is a member, and watching a Central Zone off-spinner bag a clutch of wickets against a West Zone team that featured, if I remember right, Vinod Kambli, Amol Mazumdar, and Sachin Tendulkar (though I think the last of these was not batting on the day). That off-spinner, Rajesh Chauhan, was selected to play for India soon after.

Watching Test matches was a step higher in terms of excitement. The cavernous stands at Chepauk with concrete roofs that helped to keep the sun out just a little, the colour in the stands, the chit-chat among neighbouring spectators, the Mexican waves that did the rounds every now and then – all these were new and stimulating experiences. I once saw a fellow spectator with a portable TV so they could catch the replays; years later when I saw my (so far) last Test match at the stadium, some of the stands had TVs mounted on the pillars, beaming live (well, almost live, there being a delay of about a second) action and replays. (The mammoth scoreboard at the Kumbhat Stand end of the ground, which used to have the players’ names and scores painted in bright yellow across a black background is now gone; in its stead stands an electronic replay-displaying scoreboard carted all the way from an Australian ground.) It was here also that I tasted first-hand the strange but palpable yearning of every spectator at the stadium to get his or her fifteen seconds of fame by being shown on television. There was much frantic waving of hands and witty banners whenever the cameramen turned his lens in our direction.

From there it was on to Pune. I don’t know if the Poona Club still hosts Ranji Trophy matches, but if it does, it must surely be unique in being a first-class venue with almost no seating for spectators – the only spectators being the ones in the club house. The ground itself was lush green, and its historical significance in being the venue of B.B. Nimbalkar’s famous 443 not out in years gone by made it glow a little more in my eyes. The sightscreen was a white cloth tied to a bamboo frame, quite unlike the Test match grounds where the practice of using sliding panels to use the sightscreen at the batsman’s end as an advertisement had already become established.

If Poona Club was the epitome of this dichotomous city’s ‘Camp’ or cantonment area, then Nehru Stadium was right in the middle of the more traditional ‘City’ area. This was where the one-dayers were played, and it seated thousands of people, though perhaps fewer than Chepauk. At this ground I did not have the privileged behind-the-bowler’s-arm view of the cricket, but watched the action from a shamiana-covered stand square of the wicket. The memories from here are not very detailed, except the way people rolled their paper caps into cones and shouted ‘oo-aa-oo-aa-oo-aa’ as the bowler began his run-up.

Watching the action on television just does not compare with the real thing. When you are at the ground, you can feel the speed at which the pacer hurls the ball, sense the quickness of the batsman’s reflexes, see the effort the fielder at fine leg actually makes when he sprints all the way to the square leg boundary. There is no commentary, and so you are closer to the players. You see things as they see them. You feel the heat they feel. You glance up at the scoreboard just as they do. When the twelfth man runs up with a bottle of water, you, sitting in the stands, reach for your own. Now which channel can top that?

Hello

It’s been ages since I posted, though of course that’s not much of a surprise. I noticed that the page still gets a few visits on most days, so that encourages me to write a few lines now and then.

Hopefully I will be able to do post a little more regularly (it’s a relative term, of course).

As Well As

A phrase I used in the previous post reminds me of something I have often thought about: how exactly does one use the construction “as well as”?

Very frequently we find “as well as” being used more or less as a substitute for “and”. Sample this. A talks to B about a Tamilian acquaintance: “He speaks Tamil as well as Telugu.” That the gentleman talks both languages is now perfectly clear. But A also wanted to make the point that while it was natural for the gentleman to speak Tamil, the Telugu was something of an achievement.

In my opinion, it ought to be the other way around: “He speaks Telugu as well as Tamil.” That is to say, the less obvious information comes before the “as well as” construction, and the more obvious one comes after it. This would make sense, because we are comparing the fact of his speaking Telugu against the known or more obvious fact of his speaking Tamil, i.e., as well as it is true that he speaks Tamil, it is also true that he speaks Telugu. 

Colour and Flavour

No, this has nothing to do with the spelling of ‘honour’ as discussed in the previous post. Some time ago I was listening to a BBC Radio show on our perceptions of flavour. Apparently the way we perceive the flavour of a food depends on colour as well as on taste. So that, for instance, if one is given two glasses of juice – one coloured orange and one pink – to taste, one might be very likely to think the first one was orangeade and the second strawberry, even if it were actually the other way around (using artificial colour).

History of the City

Over the past week, I have really grown in stature. That is to say, I have been growing fat on home food and the contents of our well-stocked refrigerator. So the Madras Day celebrations that I wrote about in my last post represented a good way for me to locomote a little and use some of that stored energy.

I called a friend from college (who’s relaxing at home and getting ready to embark on research on some extremely complex area of physics), and we were off to Fort St. George, where it all began 369 years ago (see previous post). We followed the signs to the Madras Day exhibition of maps, coins and old photographs and arrived at the Clive House, where Robert Clive had stayed when he was in Madras. (At this point we were still busy chatting about old times and the future – we hadn’t met for a very long time – and so it was only when we saw one of the labelled photographs in the exhibition that we actually consciously noted that this was Clive House!)

The exhibition at Clive House

We walked up one flight of broad wooden stairs and arrived at a large pillared hall, where a sizable crowd was milling around. We began to go around the exhibits – and in typical tourist fashion, spent a lot of time viewing the first few exhibits and progressively less time on the later ones. There were a number of prints of old black and white Madras photographs – including ones of Central Station (with a tram outside sporting an ad for Ovaltine) and Egmore Station. Which brings us to a nice anecdote. 

The photograph of Egmore station had a caption that mentioned that it was opened in 1908. A gentleman was arguing with his friend in Tamil about how there could possibly be a Standard (a taxi) standing outside the station in 1908, until he was cheerfully reminded by my friend and another member of his group that nobody had claimed that the photograph itself had been taken in 1908. Whereupon he cheerfully guffawed. That somehow signified the spirit of the event: people came in good numbers and with a healthy dose of curiosity and humour to educate themselves about their city’s history.

Anyway, to get on with my description. There were several maps dating from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries in the languages of the many colonial powers of the day, showing Madras and South India in general. My friend noticed that there was no mention of any civilisation south of the Adyar river in those maps, indicating Adyar’s (the locality) more recent vintage. There were several pictures: Mount Road in the late nineteenth century, unrecognisably relaxed and uncrowded, a balloon saying ‘8 anna sale’; Mowbray’s Road when it seemed little more than a jungle track; Presidency College and other beachfront buildings. There were also ancient letters written in beautiful handwriting, English and Tamil – one of them bore a stamp whose value was printed in English and Urdu.

We emerged from the exhibition, and noticed the staircase once again. There was a little architectural idiosyncrasy that was quite intriguing; between the floor we were on and the next one, there was a door at an intermediate level, and it had its own little staircase leading up to the higher floor. How, my sister asked later when I mentioned this to her, did one get to the intermediate level then? Somehow that didn’t occur to us.

It is probably pertinent to mention here that the interior of Fort St. George is like a little model town. Barracks, a government house, Clive House, an army warehouse, and even named streets. There is also a church, probably the anchor of the British community that stayed in the fort, and certainly the keeper of many of its records. Thither did we proceed.

St. Mary’s Church

St. Mary’s Church has a simple, solid structure; a tower and a spire (now under renovation), and an attached hall. In what seems like a synthesis of Indian sensibilities with British tradition, visitors to the church leave their footwear outside before proceeding to the calm interior. Near the entrance, there are photographs from visits of British royalty to the Church – Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip in 1961, Prince Charles in the 1980s and Prince Edward in the late 1990s, booklets about the history of the church, and envelopes bearing an Indian stamp issued on the tricentenary of the Church, which began functioning in 1680.

At the back is a glass display case with various records from the history of the Church. A book of baptisms stood open at the pages for January and February of a year in the early nineteenth century. There was also one very interesting 1852 letter from Sir Vansittart Stonehouse, Accountant General, to the Reverend Dr. W. Powell, Chaplain of Saint Mary’s. Aside of the beautiful handwriting (it is indeed fascinating that every literate person in those days seems to have been blessed with one), it is the spelling of a particular word that stood out. For the Accountant General writes at the end of his letter, “I have the honor to be…” (italics mine). Elsewhere in the letter too, the word in this or other forms (like ‘honourable’) occurs without the ‘u’, as it does now in American English. And yet there is no reason to believe that Sir Vansittart was American. Perhaps, then, there was some sort of shift in spellings over the years within British English itself.

Fort Museum

We proceeded to walk to Fort Museum, mulled over the fact that we were paying five rupees apiece for tickets while non-Indians would pay two dollars, and made a relatively quick tour of the exhibits. There were army uniforms (imagine the poor soldiers who had to wear those thick woollen suits in the Madras heat – no matter that it may have been milder in those days), chinaware, a huge statue of Lord Cornwallis (‘Karanvalis Pirabu’ said the Tamil inscription), large portraits of assorted Kings, Queens and Nawabs (or ‘Nabobs’) as they were then called, and a large number of engravings and sketches of scenes from Madras and other parts of South India during the Raj, and original letters written by Robert Clive, written at a time when English seems to have required the first letters of nouns to be capitalised. The portraits, among other things, show a marked improvement with time in matters of sartorial elegance on the part of the subjects (starting with Newton-style long, curly wigs in the seventeenth century, progressing to less ostentatious wigs in the eighteenth, and finally arriving at the no-wigs-required policy of the twentieth century), while some of the engravings showed a penchant for the exotic in terms of their atmospheric elements – an elephant or a snake in the foreground, mountains in the background. 

I am sure there must be a lot more to Fort St. George than what we saw, and perhaps we will be able to go on one of the Heritage Walks this coming weekend to learn more. For the moment, I am amazed at my laziness in never having visited the place before (as far as I can remember), and have come away with a renewed awareness of how little I know about my hometown. Perhaps I will get to write more about it in the near future.

Madras Day – seems a great idea

I have moved around a fair bit within India, but Chennai is definitely my hometown, and the city I have spent the most time in so far. Having said that, I don’t have a great deal of knowledge about the city’s history other than whatever I may have passively picked up during the years spent here. So it was nice to know that some proud Chennaiites have decided to put together a week of events that will promote citizens’ awareness of their own city, under the moniker “The Madras Day”.

Here’s a website with details on the events being organised: http://themadrasday.in. According to the website, “Madras Day was an idea that three people put together – the city’s famed historian, S. Muthiah, journalist Sashi Nair and publisher Vincent D’ Souza.” They’ve put together heritage walks, talks, exhibitions and contests. The idea is certainly commendable. I hope I’ll find the time to go and have a dekko.

If you’re interested in the historical details, some discussion on what Madras Day is. http://themadrasday.in has this to say:

“…a sliver of land, where Fort. St. George stands today, was transacted by the East India Company…
The deal was struck by Francis Day, his ‘dubash’ Beri Thimmappa, and their superior, Andrew Cogan, with the local Nayak rulers…It is believed that this deal was made on August 22, 1639.”

According to the World Book, the British rented a piece of land from the raja of Chandragiri near the village of Madraspatnam in 1639, and between 1640 and 1644, what we know as Fort St. George was built there.

Classical Concerts on DW TV

Deutsche Welle (DW) TV, the German / English channel, is showing a series of six Western classical symphonies. The following link (www.dw-world.de/dw/0,2142,9698,00.html) has a much more comprehensive write-up than I could manage, so I won’t bother with one. However, a few comments from what little I saw of the Bruckner symphony. I’ve watched a few classical concerts on TV before, but this one has several novel and remarkable features. As the orchestra goes through some softer passages, the conductor Kent Nagano explains a few points, members of the orchestra are pictured during practice sessions, and animated sequences serve to illustrate the process of composition, drawing upon historical resources. And then, smoothly, we are back watching the performers. I am neither an expert on nor a connoisseur of Western classical music, so the format of the telecast was perfect for me.